← Về thư mục
📄 / / profiles / r-and-d / raw_evidence / scientific-agent-skills / skills / scientific-writing / references / professional_report_formatting.md

Safe Formatting for Reports and Manuscripts

Content before presentation

The former LaTeX style and demonstration report were removed. They could turn plausible-looking placeholder findings into a polished PDF. This version uses format-neutral Markdown and JSON/CSV registries so incompleteness remains visible.

Do not format a draft as submission-ready while any verification gate is incomplete. Visual polish is not evidence.

Workflow

  1. Create a local scaffold.
  2. Draft and verify content in Markdown.
  3. Run manifest, claim, reference, consistency, authorship, coverage, and lint checks.
  4. Obtain accountable human approval.
  5. Copy the verified content into the current venue template.
  6. Re-run checks that remain applicable and inspect the rendered output manually.

For a journal or conference, use its current author instructions and official template. For an institutional report or thesis, use the institution's controlled template.

Fail-closed placeholder policy

Permitted draft markers are intentionally conspicuous, such as [[TODO:...]]. The language linter treats them as errors. Never replace an unresolved marker with generic boilerplate, a guessed number, a fabricated statement, or an invented citation.

Keep:

until the underlying records are verified.

Headings and navigation

Typography and layout

Tables, figures, and accessibility

Follow figures_tables.md. Verify alt text, captions, provenance, permissions, color independence, reading order, label legibility, and final-size rendering. Do not create a decorative visual simply to make a report appear complete.

References and declarations

References must render from verified metadata. After conversion, inspect identifier links, special characters, author order, and citation order.

Declarations must come from validated records. A style template must never supply a default ethics approval, consent statement, funding source, conflict statement, author contribution, data or code promise, or AI disclosure.

Archival handoff

Retain:

Do not archive sensitive source documents alongside a public manuscript package unless authorization, consent, law, contracts, and policy permit it.