← Về thư mục
NCA reporting checklist
An NCA result is uninterpretable — and irreproducible — unless every item below is stated. Most
disagreements between two analyses of the same data resolve to one of the first four.
The four conventions that change the answer
- [ ] Trapezoidal rule: linear / linear-up-log-down / log-linear
- [ ] BLQ handling, stated separately for each position:
- leading (before the first quantifiable sample): [ zero / excluded ]
- embedded: [ zero / LLOQ÷2 / excluded ]
- trailing: [ excluded / other ]
- [ ] Lambda_z selection: the rule, the minimum number of points, whether Tmax was excluded, and
the window and point count actually used for each subject
- [ ] AUCinf basis: observed Clast or predicted Clast
Data
- [ ] Analyte, matrix, assay, LLOQ, and the bioanalytical validation report reference
- [ ] Actual elapsed times used, not nominal — and nominal times used only for grouping
- [ ] Dose actually administered per subject, including any deviations
- [ ] Records excluded, with the reason, and confirmation the criteria were set before unblinding
- [ ] Deviations in sampling time above [ ]% of the nominal time, and how they were handled
Parameters reported
- [ ] Cmax and Tmax as observed values, never interpolated
- [ ] AUClast, AUCinf (both observed- and predicted-based, or one with the basis stated)
- [ ] % AUC extrapolated, per subject
- [ ] lambda_z, t½, and the number of points and time span of the terminal fit, per subject
- [ ] CL or CL/F, Vz or Vz/F — with
/F used for every extravascular route
- [ ] Vss only for intravenous data
- [ ] At steady state: AUC(0-tau), Cavg, Cmin, PTF%, accumulation ratio — and not AUCinf
- [ ] Partial AUCs, if pre-specified, with their intervals
Terminal-phase quality, per subject
- [ ] Adjusted r-squared of the lambda_z regression
- [ ] Span ratio (window duration ÷ t½); flag below 2
- [ ] % AUC extrapolated; flag above 20%
- [ ] Number of points in the fit; flag below 3
- [ ] Subjects for whom lambda_z was not estimable, and how they were handled in the summary
Summary statistics
- [ ] Exposure metrics (AUC, Cmax) as geometric mean and geometric CV%
- [ ] Tmax as median and range
- [ ] Arithmetic mean, SD and CV% alongside, if wanted, but not instead
- [ ] n for each parameter, since it differs when lambda_z fails for some subjects
Presentation
- [ ] Individual concentration-time profiles on both linear and semi-logarithmic axes
- [ ] Mean profiles with a stated rule for handling BLQ in the mean
- [ ] A table of individual parameters, not only summary statistics
Method and provenance
- [ ] Software and version
- [ ] Units for every parameter, and confirmation that dose and concentration units are consistent
- [ ] Whether the analysis was pre-specified, and the reference to the plan
- [ ] Any deviation from the plan, with its reason
The traps this checklist exists to catch
- Reporting AUCinf from a truncated steady-state profile.
- Interpolating Cmax, or reporting a mean Tmax.
- Quoting Vz as if it were Vss, or reporting Vss from oral data.
- Applying one BLQ rule to the test arm and another to the reference.
- Presenting arithmetic means for AUC and Cmax.
- Summarising across subjects without saying that lambda_z failed for some of them.
- Omitting the lambda_z window, which makes the half-life unreproducible.