← Về thư mục
📄 / / profiles / r-and-d / raw_evidence / scientific-agent-skills / skills / iso-standards-readiness / assets / templates / quality-manual-template.md

Quality Manual Working Template

STATUS: DRAFT EXAMPLE — NOT APPROVED — NO CONFORMITY OR COMPLIANCE CLAIM

This generic structure is an authoring aid. It cannot determine applicability, establish an effective QMS, support a certification claim by itself, or replace authorized management, RA/QA, legal, regulatory, notified-body, or certification- body review. Obtain ISO standards from ISO or an authorized source; do not paste copyrighted ISO text into this file.

0. Controlled-document metadata

Field Required entry
Document ID <assigned controlled ID>
Revision <revision>
Status draft / in-review / approved
Owner <accountable role>
Effective date <YYYY-MM-DD after approval>
Supersedes <document ID/revision or none>
Evidence repository <controlled location>
Confidentiality <classification>

Approval

Approval role Named approver Decision Date Approval evidence ID
Authorized management <name/role> pending <YYYY-MM-DD> <record ID>
RA/QA <name/role> pending <YYYY-MM-DD> <record ID>
Document control <name/role> pending <YYYY-MM-DD> <record ID>

Release gate: keep status draft until every required approver records a decision, open placeholders are resolved, referenced procedures exist, and training/change impacts are approved.

1. Purpose and limits

2. QMS scope

Scope element Declared information Owner Status Evidence ID Approval ID
Legal entity/entities <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>
Sites and addresses <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>
Product families <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>
Lifecycle activities <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>
Outsourced processes <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>
Markets considered <entry> <role> draft <ID> <ID>

2.1 Applicability decisions

Do not infer applicability from a checklist. Record each decision made by an authorized human.

Topic/process Decision Rationale Source/version Decision owner Approval/date
<topic> applicable / not-applicable / undetermined <rationale> <official source> <role> <record>

Undetermined is a blocking status. A not-applicable entry requires a documented, approved rationale and must not be described as an automatic exclusion.

3. Controlled source and version basis

Source ID Official title Edition/version/date Authorized location Currency review date Owner Impact approval
<ID> <title> <version> <location/URL> <YYYY-MM-DD> <role> <record ID>

At minimum, distinguish the source basis used for:

4. Governance, authority, and responsibilities

Role Authority and responsibility Independence/escalation Delegate Competence evidence Approval
Top management <entry> <entry> <entry> <ID> <ID>
Authorized management representative <entry> <entry> <entry> <ID> <ID>
RA/QA owner <entry> <entry> <entry> <ID> <ID>
Process owner <entry> <entry> <entry> <ID> <ID>
Document/record owner <entry> <entry> <entry> <ID> <ID>

5. Process architecture and interactions

Use organization-specific processes. Do not copy a standard's clauses as procedures.

Process Inputs Outputs Owner Controlled procedure Records/evidence Measures Approval
Scope and quality planning <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Document and record control <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Risk management <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Design and development <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Supplier controls <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Production/service <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Validation and software assurance <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Identification/traceability <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Complaints, feedback, vigilance <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Nonconformity and CAPA <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Internal audit <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Management review <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Training and competence <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>
Change control <entry> <entry> <role> <ID> <IDs> <measure> <ID>

Attach an approved process interaction map as evidence: <record ID/location>.

6. Documentation and record controls

7. Product lifecycle controls

For each applicable process, describe the policy-level approach and reference controlled evidence. Cover, as applicable:

Topic Policy summary Owner Procedure Evidence set Status Approval
<topic> <organization-specific summary> <role> <ID> <IDs> draft <ID>

8. Feedback, postmarket, and improvement controls

Document the links among feedback, complaints, reportability/vigilance decisions, risk updates, nonconformity, CAPA, change control, and management review.

Link Method Owner Input evidence Output evidence Approval
Complaint → reportability review <entry> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Postmarket signal → risk update <entry> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Nonconformity → CAPA decision <entry> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
CAPA → effectiveness review <entry> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Change → validation/training <entry> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>

9. Assurance and oversight

Activity Scope/frequency basis Independence Owner Evidence Open actions Approval
Internal audit <risk-based basis> <controls> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Management review <planned basis> n/a <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Supplier monitoring <risk-based basis> <controls> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>
Validation review <change/risk basis> <controls> <role> <IDs> <IDs> <ID>

10. Appendices

Final release checklist