{
  "2609.15009": {
    "title": "CoMem: Collective-Individual Memory Synergy for Evolutionary Multi-Agent Systems",
    "authors": "Chengxin Yu, Zhaoxin Fan, Faguo Wu, Hongwei Zheng, Yun Zhou, Zhiyu Li",
    "abstract": "Abstract:Designing effective memory mechanisms is crucial for advancing LLM-driven Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), helping agents learn together and perform better over time. While recent work has led to strong cooperation skills, most methods still use flat, unstructured memories, which easily get filled with noise and erase differences between agents. To address this, we introduce the concept of collective-individual memory synergy and propose CoMem, an architecture that unifies both private experience and shared knowledge for multi-agent learning. CoMem features:(i) Private Experience Sedimentation, which lets each agent keep and update its own useful memories over time;(ii) Collective Wisdom Curation, which carefully selects only widely proven ideas to be shared among agents;(iii)Parallel Dual-Stream Retrieval, which allows agents to draw both from their own memory and the group&#39;s wisdom, using clustering to ensure this http URL on ALFWorld and PDDL benchmarks show that CoMem achieves strong overall performance and robustly avoids memory pollution.",
    "dateline": "[Submitted on 14 Sep 2026]",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15009"
  },
  "2609.05505": {
    "title": "SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews",
    "authors": "Miguel Zabaleta, Baihan Lin",
    "abstract": "Abstract:Systematic reviews require sustained human judgment across thousands of records, yet existing evaluations of large language models (LLMs) typically examine review stages in isolation. We introduce SciLitBench, a multi-stage benchmark spanning title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and schema-guided data extraction, with 42,981 retrieved records, 1,012 full texts, and annotations for 888 included papers. Across 22 open-weight LLMs from six model families, explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria improve title and abstract screening $F_2$ by 28.8\\%, while researcher-authored rationales improve full-text screening by 15\\%. Data extraction reveals a different reliability regime: performance declines from 0.97 accuracy for publication year to 0.37 Jaccard overlap for computational approach, while the strongest models recover only 30\\% of annotated evaluation evidence and 25\\% of limitations. SciLitBench identifies a practical boundary between high-recall screening and evidence-complete extraction and provides a reproducible resource for evaluating LLM-assisted evidence synthesis.",
    "dateline": "[Submitted on 29 Aug 2026]",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05505"
  },
  "2609.00065": {
    "title": "Scientific Agent Skills: A Library of Procedural Knowledge for Research Agents",
    "authors": "Timothy Kassis, Vinayak Agarwal, Yuhuan He, Darshil Patel, Aubrey M. Brueckner",
    "abstract": "Abstract:A language-model agent asked to analyse an experiment will usually return working code. Whether the analysis is defensible is a different question. A defensible analysis depends on procedural choices: which test the field accepts, which identifier namespace is authoritative, and which caveats must accompany a result. We present Scientific Agent Skills, an open library of 163 such procedures in 16 areas of practice, including genomics, cheminformatics, medical imaging, study design and scientific communication. Each skill is a directory built around a versioned, human-readable instruction file. An agent loads the file only when a task calls for it; the directory often also contains reference material and runnable scripts. We report no task-level evaluation and no host selection rate. We measure two properties of the documentation corpus: the always-resident descriptions of all 163 skills cost 7.1% of a 200,000-token window, and the median documented workflow fits within 23.9% of it, although 29 of 46 would overflow if every reference file were loaded. Openly licensed and available at this https URL.",
    "dateline": "[Submitted on 30 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 2 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)]",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00065"
  },
  "2609.00237": {
    "title": "Learning What to Retain: Gated-Memory Routing for Efficient Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM Systems",
    "authors": "Rakibul Hasan Rajib, Mengxin Zheng, Qian Lou",
    "abstract": "Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems tackle complex reasoning by orchestrating how multiple agents are configured and how they collaborate. A central challenge is to adapt orchestration to the evolving collaboration state. Routing from the query alone cannot adapt to intermediate progress or errors, which hurts accuracy. Routing from the complete execution history supplies this missing context, but forces later decisions to process every prior step, including redundant or low-utility ones. This creates an execution-history overload that inflates cost. Effective orchestration instead requires a compact state that captures useful progress without accumulating redundant context. We propose Gated-Memory Routing, which conditions each decision on the query and a learned execution memory. A learned Memory Write Gate commits only non-redundant reasoning steps, and a learned Retrieval Gate supplies each agent a compact, relevant subset, so every decision conditions on a clean, informative state. At each step, the system selects the next role and backbone from this memory, while an Adaptive Halting Controller stops execution once the memory contains sufficient evidence for answering. Across five reasoning and code-generation benchmarks, our framework is both effective and efficient: it attains the best average accuracy, exceeding the strongest baseline by 2.44 points, while reducing HumanEval inference cost by 31.9% relative to that baseline. Code is available at this https URL",
    "dateline": "[Submitted on 31 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 9 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)]",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00237"
  },
  "2609.13334": {
    "title": "The Agentic Company OS: Substrate Inversion for Sustained Enterprise Agent Deployment",
    "authors": "Oliver Aleksander Larsen, Mahyar T. Moghaddam",
    "abstract": "Abstract:Enterprise AI agents often succeed in a demonstration and then stall once they must operate day after day. An industry report estimates that most pilots never reach production and that deployed systems rarely retain feedback or improve over time, while agent benchmarks show single-run successes masking unreliable repetition. We argue that these failure modes share a common architectural root: agents reason over data structured for human operators and traditional applications, not for the language models that power them. This position paper proposes that companies deploying agents in sustained operation should rebuild their cognitive substrate, the shared environment agents read as working context, around representations matched to that reasoning surface, isolating schema translation to the action boundary. Markdown is the instantiation available today, not a proven agent-native primitive. Two mechanisms ground the argument: context-bandwidth asymmetry, the gap between one-pass reading of connected prose and field-by-field typed access that strips relations; and cross-loop coupling, the claim that action, skill, and policy loops compound only if they share one substrate. A four-layer framework (Data, Knowledge, Intelligence, Governance) operationalizes the position, with a Sync Agent enforcing the action boundary and a per-skill trust gradient, making governance and auditability structural properties of the substrate. The position revives the shared-substrate tradition of classical multi-agent systems under LLM-era economics. We analyze the main objections and risks, including indirect prompt injection on the compile path, and outline a research agenda for evaluating substrates directly.",
    "dateline": "[Submitted on 11 Sep 2026]",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13334"
  }
}