← Về thư mục
📄 / / academic-research-skills / tests / fixtures / v3_6_7_pattern_eval / A1 / good_run / deliverable.md

Synthesis: Quality Assurance Regulatory Framework

Section 2.1 — Consequences of Repeated Self-Evaluation Failure

Institutions that fail two consecutive self-evaluation cycles face significant regulatory consequences. Under Decree §12 (2021), programme accreditation is suspended 90 days after the second failing cycle is formally recorded.

Section 2.3 — Reinstatement Pathways

Decree §12 (2021) further specifies that programmes under suspension may apply for a follow-up audit. Successful completion of that audit within 24 months of the suspension effective date restores accreditation status.

Implications for Policy Design

The 90-day suspension window and the 24-month reinstatement ceiling together create a structured remediation corridor, incentivising prompt corrective action while preserving a pathway back to full standing for programmes that demonstrate genuine improvement.