fixture_id: 10_korean_review_not_revision
expected_routing_class: proceed
expected_destination: academic-paper-reviewer:full
escape_hatch_applied: false
notes: |
  Korean boundary case from issue #452 (phrases authored by the native-speaker
  proposer, @devCharlotte): 심사 (referee/assess) routes to
  academic-paper-reviewer, NOT academic-paper. Materials: complete manuscript.
  Intent: explicit review request matching the 논문 심사 trigger keyword.

  Per Routing Discipline Step 1 (explicit clear intent), route directly to
  academic-paper-reviewer full mode. The Korean noun 심사 is the standard term
  for journal refereeing — assessment intent, not editing intent.

  Pass criteria:
  - Response begins multi-perspective review (field detection, reviewer panel)
  - Response does NOT start rewriting or revising the manuscript
  - Response does NOT trigger clarification a-d options